Purplish pink
- Fancy Deep12% of cohort—
- Fancy Vivid13% of cohort$1.62M/ct · 2.17 ct · 2021
- Fancy Intense49% of cohort$18.4k/ct · 0.17 ct · 2025$40.9k/ct · 0.40 ct · 2024$59.3k/ct · 0.61 ct · 2026$92.0k/ct · 0.50 ct · 1999$104k/ct · 2.02 ct · 2017$106k/ct · 0.50 ct · 2025$158k/ct · 1.52 ct · 2023$202k/ct · 1.05 ct · 2022$262k/ct · 2.58 ct · 2021
- Fancy25% of cohort$26.2k/ct · 1.05 ct · 2019$26.2k/ct · 0.31 ct · 2025$27.2k/ct · 0.21 ct · 2025$58.6k/ct · 0.64 ct · 2020$96.9k/ct · 2.00 ct · 2021$180k/ct · 2.73 ct · 2022$366k/ct · 12.45 ct · 2016$451k/ct · 8.20 ct · 2016
- Fancy Light$43.2k/ct · 1.41 ct · 2024
| Intensity | Included n | Median $/ct | Mean $/ct | Low – high | Since 2020 | Qualified | Study stones | Share of cohort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fancy Light | 1 | $43.2k | $43.2k | — | $43.2k · n=1 | — | — | — |
| Fancy | 6 | $42.9k | $159k | $26.2k – $451k | $27.2k · n=3 | $138k · n=2 | 70 | 25% |
| Fancy Intense | 6 | $132k | $144k | $40.9k – $262k | $158k · n=5 | $59.3k · n=3 | 140 | 49% |
| Fancy Vivid | 1 | $1.62M | $1.62M | — | $1.62M · n=1 | — | 38 | 13% |
| Fancy Deep | — | — | — | — | — | — | 35 | 12% |
methodologyshow
Combined hue band; no exact directional or modifier-strength split. Former 25,200 proxy removed.
Argyle 1995–2014 selected GIA cohort: 54% Purplish pink within 1,065 stones. Exact hue count not stated (R39).
| ID | Intensity | Lot / stone | Carats | Clarity | Sale | Realised | USD / ct | Status | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A38 | Fancy | Round purplish-pink ring Mount includes approximately 0.40 ct colorless diamonds. | 0.64 ct | SI2 | Christie's New York online · 27 Aug 2020 | USD 37,500 $37,500 · USD as reported | $58.6k | Included | lot · result |
| A68 | Fancy Intense | Fancy Intense Purplish Pink diamond ring Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. | 1.52 ct | SI2 | Phillips Geneva · 6 Nov 2023 | CHF 215,900 $240,880 · Auction-house reported USD equivalent | $158k | Included | lot · result |
| A84 | Fancy Light | Fancy Light Purplish Pink diamond and diamond ring Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. | 1.41 ct | VVS2 | Phillips Geneva · 11 Nov 2024 | CHF 53,340 $60,925 · FRED local units per USD; prior business day | $43.2k | Included | lot · fx |
| A122 | Fancy | Fancy Purplish Pink Diamond and Diamond Ring Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. | 0.21 ct | Not stated | Phillips Hong Kong · 1 Apr 2025 | HKD 44,450 $5,713 · FRED local units per USD; sale date | $27.2k | Included | lot · fx |
| A167 | Fancy Intense | Pair of Fancy Intense Purplish Pink Diamond and Diamond Earrings Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. Target weight checked separately; pairs/suites use combined matching-grade weight where applicable. Catalog flags an old report. | 0.50 ct | SI1 / SI2 | Phillips Hong Kong · 30 Sept 2025 | HKD 412,800 $53,053 · FRED local units per USD; sale date | $106k | Included | lot · fx |
| A183 | Fancy Intense | Fancy Intense Purplish Pink Diamond and Diamond Ring Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. Catalog flags an old report. | 0.40 ct | I1 | Phillips Hong Kong · 15 Oct 2024 | HKD 127,000 $16,349 · FRED local units per USD; sale date | $40.9k | Included | lot · fx |
| A297 | Fancy Vivid | COLORED DIAMOND AND DIAMOND RING Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. | 2.17 ct | SI1 | Christie's New York · 13 Apr 2021 | USD 3,510,000 $3,510,000 · USD as reported | $1.62M | Included | lot |
| A349 | Fancy | 0.31 ct Purplish pink diamond Doron Isaak ring with about 0.25 ct near-colorless and untested colored melee. | 0.31 ct | SI1 | Heritage US / online · 29 Sept 2025 | USD 8,125 $8,125 · USD as reported | $26.2k | Included | lot |
| A354 | Fancy Intense | 1.05 ct Purplish pink diamond Loose diamond; GIA report dated 2003 and accompanying Hofer letter. Current auction result, historical report date. | 1.05 ct | SI1 | Heritage US / online · 29 Sept 2022 | USD 212,500 $212,500 · USD as reported | $202k | Included | lot |
| A356 | Fancy | 1.05 ct Purplish pink diamond Loose diamond; auctioneer estimates SI2-I1 clarity but the GIA origin report does not state clarity. | 1.05 ct | Not stated by GIA | Heritage Beverly Hills · 23 Sept 2019 | USD 27,500 $27,500 · USD as reported | $26.2k | Included | lot |
| ID | Cohort | Intensity bin | Stones | Share | Period · scope | Limits | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S009 | Purplish pink | Fancy | 70 | 25% | Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort | Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share. | Table 3, printed p. 133 |
| S010 | Purplish pink | Fancy Intense | 140 | 49% | Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort | Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share. | Table 3, printed p. 133 |
| S012 | Purplish pink | Fancy Vivid | 38 | 13% | Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort | Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share. | Table 3, printed p. 133 |
| S011 | Purplish pink | Fancy Deep | 35 | 12% | Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort | Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share. | Table 3, printed p. 133 |
| ID | Cohort | Intensity bin | Stones | Share | Period · scope | Limits | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S025 | Pink-dominant family combined | Faint | 114 | 8% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S026 | Pink-dominant family combined | Very Light | 78 | 5% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S027 | Pink-dominant family combined | Light | 170 | 11% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S028 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy Light | 156 | 10% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S029 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy | 488 | 33% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S055 | Argyle pink-to-red tender family | Fancy | — | 5% | 1995–2014 Broader group; selected tender cohort | Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution. | Figure 8, printed p. 276 |
| S030 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy Intense | 282 | 19% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S056 | Argyle pink-to-red tender family | Fancy Intense | — | 46% | 1995–2014 Broader group; selected tender cohort | Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution. | Figure 8, printed p. 276 |
| S032 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy Vivid | 55 | 4% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S058 | Argyle pink-to-red tender family | Fancy Vivid | — | 17% | 1995–2014 Broader group; selected tender cohort | Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution. | Figure 8, printed p. 276 |
| S031 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy Deep | 147 | 10% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S057 | Argyle pink-to-red tender family | Fancy Deep | — | 32% | 1995–2014 Broader group; selected tender cohort | Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution. | Figure 8, printed p. 276 |
Combined hue band; no exact directional or modifier-strength split. Former 25,200 proxy removed.