Diamond Rarity
wheel / straight color

Fancy Pink

40% of >90,000 pink/purple/red/brown study stones

GIA study figure
36k
January 2008–December 2016
exact lifetime count: not publicly disclosed
Est. graded 2006–2025
73.3k–85.1k
scenario envelope, not a census
Median USD per carat
$122k
n=29 included + 14 qualified · $8.1k–$5.18M · 0.4–59.6 ct · 1996–2026
Rarity-adjusted value
×0.20
parity price $24.6k/ct ÷ median $122k/ct · n=29
×0.20 · premium over rarity
auction sales by intensity33 sales
  1. Fancy Deep19% of cohort$19.2k/ct · 1.03 ct · 2025$137k/ct · 0.80 ct · 1996
  2. Fancy Vivid3% of cohort$1.19M/ct · 59.60 ct · 2017$1.93M/ct · 6.21 ct · 2024$2.64M/ct · 18.96 ct · 2018$5.18M/ct · 11.15 ct · 2022
  3. Fancy Intense39% of cohort$51.0k/ct · 1.33 ct · 1997$80.7k/ct · 1.81 ct · 2026$95.8k/ct · 0.40 ct · 2019$102k/ct · 1.43 ct · 2019$122k/ct · 0.40 ct · 2025$176k/ct · 2.05 ct · 1997$311k/ct · 1.45 ct · 2024$448k/ct · 2.04 ct · 2022$470k/ct · 4.05 ct · 2022$658k/ct · 20.19 ct · 2023$1.47M/ct · 6.99 ct · 2023
  4. Fancy40% of cohort$18.4k/ct · 0.58 ct · 2026$29.0k/ct · 0.14 ct · 2023$38.3k/ct · 1.53 ct · 2003$48.7k/ct · 0.73 ct · 2024$114k/ct · 2.00 ct · 2025$125k/ct · 2.05 ct · 2017$237k/ct · 12.27 ct · 2023$239k/ct · 20.06 ct · 2023$329k/ct · 9.01 ct · 2013
  5. Fancy Light$27.3k/ct · 1.20 ct · 2024$40.6k/ct · 0.51 ct · 2018$50.9k/ct · 2.71 ct · 2024$106k/ct · 4.05 ct · 2026$137k/ct · 19.00 ct · 2020$200k/ct · 21.30 ct · 2014$308k/ct · 7.37 ct · 2021
price by intensity
IntensityIncluded nMedian $/ctMean $/ctLow – highSince 2020QualifiedStudy stonesShare of cohort
Fancy Light3$106k$111k$27.3k – $200k$66.5k · n=2$94.1k · n=4——
Fancy5$237k$194k$48.7k – $329k$175k · n=4$33.6k · n=411540%
Fancy Intense8$379k$467k$80.7k – $1.47M$448k · n=7$95.8k · n=311239%
Fancy Vivid3$1.93M$2.77M$1.19M – $5.18M$3.55M · n=2$2.64M · n=193%
Fancy Deep2$77.9k$77.9k$19.2k – $137k$19.2k · n=1—5419%
methodologyshow
read before interpreting

Exact study count is not stated. The previous ≈36,000 used 90,000 as though it were the full denominator. Argyle tender populations remain separate; pale pink grades are included in the GIA study.

argyle and GIA

Argyle 1995–2014: 37% straight Pink within 1,065 selected stones. Rio 2025: 76 pink-family diamonds, no exact split. Do not add to global GIA intake.

two-color grades on this hue
auction sales29 included · 14 qualified
IDIntensityLot / stoneCaratsClaritySaleRealisedUSD / ctStatusSources
A51Fancy Intense
Unmounted Argyle 2014 Tender pink
Loose diamond. Argyle 5P, lot 45 in 2014 tender. Original catalog separates GIA SI1 from Argyle SI2; do not replace GIA clarity with the secondary press transcription.
1.45 ctSI1 (GIA); SI2 (Argyle)
Christie's
London online · 5 Jun 2024
GBP 352,800
$450,561 · FRED USD per GBP; sale date
$311kIncludedlot · fx
A52Fancy Vivid
Williamson Pink Star
Williamson mine, Tanzania; not Argyle. Record-scale trophy, type IIa; published exact house USD total.
11.15 ctIF
Sotheby's
Hong Kong · 7 Oct 2022
HKD 453,223,000
$57,736,078 · Auction-house USD equivalent
$5.18MIncludedlot
A53Fancy Vivid
CTF Pink Star
Contemporaneous house USD71,170,395.88 used; 2022 retrospective gives USD71,175,926. 2013 defaulted auction excluded. South African origin; not Argyle.
59.60 ctIF
Sotheby's
Hong Kong · 4 Apr 2017
HKD 553,037,500
$71,170,396 · Auction-house USD equivalent
$1.19MIncludedlot · result
A54Fancy
Cushion pink diamond ring
Heart-shaped and brilliant-cut accent diamonds included; Argyle origin not established.
0.73 ctVS1
Phillips
New York · 12 Jun 2024
USD 35,560
$35,560 · USD as reported
$48.7kIncludedlot · result
A55Fancy
Pair of pink ear pendants, 1.00 + 1.00 ct
Combined target weight; diamond surrounds and hooks included. Argyle origin not established.
2.00 ctVVS2 / VS1
Phillips
Hong Kong · 27 Mar 2025
HKD 1,778,000
$228,655 · FRED local per USD; sale date
$114kIncludedlot · result · fx
A71Fancy Intense
Fancy Intense Pink diamond ring
Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included.
20.19 ctVVS1
Phillips
Geneva · 6 Nov 2023
CHF 11,900,000
$13,276,830 · Auction-house reported USD equivalent
$658kIncludedlot · result
A74Fancy Deep
Fancy Deep Pink diamond and diamond ring
Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included.
1.03 ctI2
Phillips
Geneva · 19 May 2025
CHF 16,510
$19,791 · FRED local units per USD; sale date
$19.2kIncludedlot · fx
A82Fancy Vivid
Exceptional Fancy Vivid Pink diamond ring
Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included.
6.21 ctVS1
Phillips
Geneva · 13 May 2024
CHF 10,869,500
$11,977,410 · FRED local units per USD; sale date
$1.93MIncludedlot · fx
A121Fancy Intense
Fancy Intense Pink Diamond and Diamond Ring
Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included.
0.40 ctSI1
Phillips
Hong Kong · 1 Apr 2025
HKD 381,000
$48,970 · FRED local units per USD; sale date
$122kIncludedlot · fx
A131Fancy Light
Fancy Light Pink Diamond and Diamond Ring
Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included.
4.05 ctIF
Phillips
Hong Kong · 30 Mar 2026
HKD 3,354,000
$427,986 · FRED local units per USD; sale date
$106kIncludedlot · fx
1–10 of 43
1 / 5
population scenarios 2006–2025
point input36k · window 2008–2016
scenario envelope 2006–202573.3k–85.1k
IN36k
M180.5k
M2A82.6k
M2B85.1k
M373.3k

40% × 90,000 (R30), Jan 2008–Dec 2016. Rounded share and lower-bounded population; 36,000 is an inferred point, not a proven floor.

Argyle is a conditional proxy, not a complete origin model. After mine closure, first grading can still involve old inventory, newly polished rough and other mines.

supply evidence
this exact grade
IDCohortIntensity binStonesSharePeriod · scopeLimitsSource
S067PinkFaint through Light—54%2008–2016
Exact hue; combined intensities

Individual unlabelled 2018 bars do not reconcile cleanly with the stated combined percentage. No reconstructed per-bin percentages used. The 2002 counts describe a separate cohort.

Color grading discussion and figure 3
S001PinkFancy11540%Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed
Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort

Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share.

Table 3, printed p. 133
S002PinkFancy Intense11239%Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed
Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort

Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share.

Table 3, printed p. 133
S004PinkFancy Vivid93%Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed
Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort

Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share.

Table 3, printed p. 133
S003PinkFancy Deep5419%Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed
Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort

Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share.

Table 3, printed p. 133
related pooled cohorts · cannot be assigned to this grade
IDCohortIntensity binStonesSharePeriod · scopeLimitsSource
S025Pink-dominant family combinedFaint1148%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S026Pink-dominant family combinedVery Light785%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S027Pink-dominant family combinedLight17011%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S028Pink-dominant family combinedFancy Light15610%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S029Pink-dominant family combinedFancy48833%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S055Argyle pink-to-red tender familyFancy—5%1995–2014
Broader group; selected tender cohort

Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution.

Figure 8, printed p. 276
S030Pink-dominant family combinedFancy Intense28219%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S056Argyle pink-to-red tender familyFancy Intense—46%1995–2014
Broader group; selected tender cohort

Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution.

Figure 8, printed p. 276
S032Pink-dominant family combinedFancy Vivid554%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S058Argyle pink-to-red tender familyFancy Vivid—17%1995–2014
Broader group; selected tender cohort

Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution.

Figure 8, printed p. 276
S031Pink-dominant family combinedFancy Deep14710%Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed
Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues

Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts.

Table 2, printed p. 133
S057Argyle pink-to-red tender familyFancy Deep—32%1995–2014
Broader group; selected tender cohort

Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution.

Figure 8, printed p. 276
evidence
R30
G2
Pink — unmodified40% of >90,000Exact count not stated
>90,000 pink/purple/red/brown submissions · 2008-01 through 2016-12

Published share of an incompletely specified study population. Former 36,000 proxy removed.

R36
G11
Argyle straight Pink37% of 1065Exact count not stated
GIA-graded tender study subset · 1995–2014

Rounded 37% of 1,065 selected Argyle tender stones, not a published exact pink count.

AR05
Argyle
Pink family · 2025 tender inventory76 diamonds
Pink, Purple-Pink and Purplish Pink combined · 2025 final Beyond Rare tender · Three grade categories pooled

No exact split for straight Pink disclosed.

AR06
Argyle
Pink and red · Final Signature Tender70 diamonds
81.63 ct in combined pink/red collection · 2021 · Mixed grades

Selected inventory; not all mined or GIA-graded stones.

AR09
Argyle
Pink family · Historical global supply share>90% share
Argyle producer statement · Operating-era context · Broader than straight Pink

Supply claim is not a GIA-grade breakdown.