Purple-pink
- Fancy Deep4% of cohort$106k/ct · 1.51 ct · 2022
- Fancy Vivid10% of cohort$147k/ct · 1.29 ct · 1998$1.00M/ct · 6.89 ct · 2010$1.85M/ct · 15.81 ct · 2021
- Fancy Intense20% of cohort$29.5k/ct · 0.82 ct · 1999$32.2k/ct · 1.03 ct · 2001$162k/ct · 9.77 ct · 2001$196k/ct · 0.91 ct · 2026$878k/ct · 10.07 ct · 2016
- Fancy66% of cohort$6.0k/ct · 1.06 ct · 2025$6.7k/ct · 1.58 ct · 2021$7.7k/ct · 0.31 ct · 2016$17.9k/ct · 0.30 ct · 2024$23.8k/ct · 0.21 ct · 2014$46.7k/ct · 1.63 ct · 2024$51.6k/ct · 2.50 ct · 1997$56.3k/ct · 1.00 ct · 2020$124k/ct · 7.30 ct · 2010$1.35M/ct · 10.38 ct · 2025
- Fancy Light—
| Intensity | Included n | Median $/ct | Mean $/ct | Low – high | Since 2020 | Qualified | Study stones | Share of cohort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fancy Light | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fancy | 6 | $35.3k | $44.0k | $6.0k – $124k | $46.7k · n=3 | $34.8k · n=4 | 33 | 66% |
| Fancy Intense | 5 | $162k | $260k | $29.5k – $878k | $196k · n=1 | — | 10 | 20% |
| Fancy Vivid | 3 | $1.00M | $1.00M | $147k – $1.85M | $1.85M · n=1 | — | 5 | 10% |
| Fancy Deep | — | — | — | — | — | $106k · n=1 | 2 | 4% |
methodologyshow
Combined hue band; no exact directional or modifier-strength split. Former 25,200 proxy removed.
Argyle 1995–2014 selected GIA cohort: 4% Purple-pink within 1,065 stones. Exact hue count not stated (R40).
| ID | Intensity | Lot / stone | Carats | Clarity | Sale | Realised | USD / ct | Status | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A33 | Fancy | Purple-pink ring Jewelry lot price. | 1.00 ct | SI1 | Christie's New York online · 27 Aug 2020 | USD 56,250 $56,250 · USD as reported | $56.3k | Included | lot · result |
| A34 | Fancy | Unmounted purple-pink diamond Loose-stone comparison. | 1.63 ct | SI2 | Phillips New York · 13 Dec 2024 | USD 76,200 $76,200 · USD as reported | $46.7k | Included | lot |
| A35 | Fancy | Purple-pink halo ring Includes 0.50–0.60 ct accent diamonds; I3 clarity explains part of spread. | 1.06 ct | I3 | Bonhams Los Angeles online · 25 Mar 2025 | USD 6,400 $6,400 · USD as reported | $6.0k | Included | lot |
| A37 | Fancy Vivid | The Sakura Record-scale vivid purple-pink; not pure purple. | 15.81 ct | IF; potentially FL | Christie's Hong Kong · 23 May 2021 | HKD 226,275,000 $29,285,318 · Auction-house USD equivalent | $1.85M | Included | lot |
| A251 | Fancy Intense | A FANCY INTENSE PURPLE-PINK DIAMOND AND DIAMOND RING Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. | 1.03 ct | Not stated | Christie's Hong Kong · 1 May 2001 | HKD 258,500 $33,144 · FRED local units per USD; sale date | $32.2k | Included | lot · fx |
| A253 | Fancy Intense | A RARE FANCY INTENSE PURPLE-PINK DIAMOND RING Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. | 9.77 ct | VVS1 | Christie's Geneva · 17 May 2001 | CHF 2,759,750 $1,586,702 · FRED local units per USD; sale date | $162k | Included | lot · fx |
| A284 | Fancy | A COLORED DIAMOND RING, BY TAFFIN Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. | 7.30 ct | VVS1 | Christie's New York · 7 Dec 2010 | USD 902,500 $902,500 · USD as reported | $124k | Included | lot |
| A289 | Fancy Intense | A RARE COLORED DIAMOND AND DIAMOND RING Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. Potential/improvable clarity is mentioned; use the reported present grade, not a promised upgrade. | 10.07 ct | VS1 | Christie's 纽约 · 20 Apr 2016 | USD 8,845,000 $8,845,000 · USD as reported | $878k | Included | lot |
| A305 | Fancy Intense | COLOURED DIAMOND RING Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. | 0.91 ct | SI2 | Christie's Geneva · 13 May 2026 | CHF 139,700 $178,530 · FRED local units per USD; sale date | $196k | Included | lot · fx |
| A306 | Fancy | A COLORED DIAMOND AND DIAMOND RING Whole-lot price divided by target colored carat weight; mounting, accents and signature are included. | 0.21 ct | SI1 | Christie's New York (online) · 28 Oct 2014 | USD 5,000 $5,000 · USD as reported | $23.8k | Included | lot |
| ID | Cohort | Intensity bin | Stones | Share | Period · scope | Limits | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S005 | Purple-pink | Fancy | 33 | 66% | Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort | Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share. | Table 3, printed p. 133 |
| S006 | Purple-pink | Fancy Intense | 10 | 20% | Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort | Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share. | Table 3, printed p. 133 |
| S008 | Purple-pink | Fancy Vivid | 5 | 10% | Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort | Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share. | Table 3, printed p. 133 |
| S007 | Purple-pink | Fancy Deep | 2 | 4% | Specific period before 2002; calendar dates undisclosed Exact hue; selected historical grading cohort | Pale grades are not broken down by exact hue. Zeros apply only to this study. Printed table percentages use a different denominator (hues within intensity); this workbook calculates the within-hue four-grade share. | Table 3, printed p. 133 |
| ID | Cohort | Intensity bin | Stones | Share | Period · scope | Limits | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S025 | Pink-dominant family combined | Faint | 114 | 8% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S026 | Pink-dominant family combined | Very Light | 78 | 5% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S027 | Pink-dominant family combined | Light | 170 | 11% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S028 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy Light | 156 | 10% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S029 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy | 488 | 33% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S055 | Argyle pink-to-red tender family | Fancy | — | 5% | 1995–2014 Broader group; selected tender cohort | Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution. | Figure 8, printed p. 276 |
| S030 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy Intense | 282 | 19% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S056 | Argyle pink-to-red tender family | Fancy Intense | — | 46% | 1995–2014 Broader group; selected tender cohort | Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution. | Figure 8, printed p. 276 |
| S032 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy Vivid | 55 | 4% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S058 | Argyle pink-to-red tender family | Fancy Vivid | — | 17% | 1995–2014 Broader group; selected tender cohort | Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution. | Figure 8, printed p. 276 |
| S031 | Pink-dominant family combined | Fancy Deep | 147 | 10% | Specific period before 2002; dates undisclosed Broader group; cannot allocate to individual hues | Includes straight and modified pink. Do not use as straight-pink counts. | Table 2, printed p. 133 |
| S057 | Argyle pink-to-red tender family | Fancy Deep | — | 32% | 1995–2014 Broader group; selected tender cohort | Combines straight/modified pink and red. Fancy includes red. This selection is not mine output or an exact-hue distribution. | Figure 8, printed p. 276 |
Combined hue band; no exact directional or modifier-strength split. Former 25,200 proxy removed.